Author Topic: Article on the LPC Burn  (Read 12090 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kew

  • Guest
Re: Article on the LPC Burn
« Reply #20 on: May 10, 06, 05:42:48 PM »
Don't let um rain on your parade. Its a great picture photograph and you got a "by line." Many of your photographs are worthy of publication. Keep up the good work and I'll keep enjoying them.

wwpt

  • Guest
Re: Article on the LPC Burn
« Reply #21 on: May 10, 06, 07:15:59 PM »
 

 
  Congo rats! Nice pic...I read the article and didn't even catch it was your pic...Keep sending them in.

Calindy

  • Guest
Re: Article on the LPC Burn
« Reply #22 on: May 10, 06, 08:24:38 PM »
Great Job!!  I agree, it is VERY exciting when your first picture is published. Only a photographer realizes how many pictures you have taken, and all the hard work that comes before a picture is published! I am so happy for you :2thumbsup: :2thumbsup:


gypsywolf

  • Guest
Re: Article on the LPC Burn
« Reply #23 on: May 10, 06, 08:57:12 PM »
Stupid writer..great photographer!!

 :2thumbsup:

My sincerest congratulations!!

I can only imagine how exciting that must be!


Offline Laughlinguy

  • Bear
  • ****
  • Posts: 341
Re: Article on the LPC Burn
« Reply #24 on: May 11, 06, 12:39:22 AM »
Way  8) Angel!! Well done.  :2thumbsup:

Offline K9luvr

  • Raccoon
  • *****
  • Posts: 817
Re: Article on the LPC Burn
« Reply #25 on: May 12, 06, 09:44:29 AM »
Well, I think it all depend on how you read the article....  I took it as they entire project area was 3600 acres--which, if you take in ALL the units I believe that is accurate.  The actual treatment acres for this particular burn was less--but it was my understanding that the treatments would be rotated throughout the entire 3600 acre treatment acres.  Now, the headline is a little misleading--but the person who writes the article is not the person who writes the headlines....

 

anything