Well, I think it all depend on how you read the article.... I took it as they entire project area was 3600 acres--which, if you take in ALL the units I believe that is accurate. The actual treatment acres for this particular burn was less--but it was my understanding that the treatments would be rotated throughout the entire 3600 acre treatment acres. Now, the headline is a little misleading--but the person who writes the article is not the person who writes the headlines....