Author Topic: Rattlesnake bite procedure?  (Read 19526 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Wrightwood

  • Administrator
  • Raccoon
  • *****
  • Posts: Plenty of Posts!
  • Wildlife Gateway
Re: Rattlesnake bite procedure?
« Reply #20 on: Jun 15, 07, 01:36:17 PM »

Offline RobertW

  • Moderator
  • Raccoon
  • *****
  • Posts: Plenty of Posts!
  • Clear Skies!
Re: Rattlesnake bite procedure?
« Reply #21 on: Jun 15, 07, 10:17:02 PM »
Thanks hikin_jim...
I'm not sure how I would respond to a snake bite victim after reading that new theory.

I still think that I'd use the Sawyer Extractor if it was handy and the bite had just occurred. Say within the first 10 minutes or so. I see this as a choice between removing some of the possible venom right away vs the exacerbated tissue damage.

I believe the new thinking is:  The venom has been injected.  Any efforts to try and extract it, even partially will cause harm to the entry wound. (I have received a bruise from using the Sawyer Extractor.  It's quite a "sucker".)  Better to relax, get medical help and get to a hospital as soon as possible so as to let the anti-venom do it's magic.

Personally, I'd use the extractor, since I always carry it.  Realistically, I don't ever plan on being bit, as I'm always careful and watchful, looking for rattlers when I hike.  "An ounce of Prevention is worth a pound of cure!"

Offline cedar

  • Scrub Jay
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: Rattlesnake bite procedure?
« Reply #22 on: Jun 20, 07, 09:54:28 PM »
"I just went through a Wilderness First Aid course this past weekend.  They said not to use the Sawyer Extractor (and definitely not the old Cutter devices).  They showed us some gnarly photos of snake bite victims."



What kind of snakes caused the bites in the 'gnarly photos'?  When I lived in East Texas they said the copperheads caused the most tissue damage, that you could lose the muscel that was injected with venom.  I haven't heard of that kind of damage with our local pacific rattlesnakes.

I did hear that the reason that they initially adviced not to use the 'cut and suction' kits because people were too excited after a snake bite and the victims ended up with major slashes with the razor blade. So I wonder, do the people who are recommending not to use the Sawer, just feel the general public is too incompent to use it (delaying the trip to the hospital) or is it truly a bad idea to remove the venom that will easily come out of the puncture marks. I demo the Sawyer on my arm to people on a regular basis.  I find that it has strong, but resonable suction, and I have never received a bruise - just slight redness for a few minutes.  I would not use it on someone with delicate skin such as a baby or elderly person.  But what are the chances of that? 

A great discussion is at http://gorp.away.com/gorp/health/snakefaq13.htm.  Here is an exerpt "Approximately 75 percent of all snakebites occur in people aged between 19 and 30 years, 1 percent to 2 percent occur in women, and less than 1 percent occur in blacks. Approximately 40 percent of all snakebites occur in people who are handling or playing with snakes, and 40 percent of all people bitten had a blood alcohol level of greater than 0.1 percent. Sixty-five percent of snakebites occur on the hand or fingers, 24 percent on the foot or ankle, and 11 percent elsewhere.

So it seems that getting drunk and messing about snakes is a big cause of getting bitten. It also seems that male yahooism is a precursor to snake toxin poisoning. Women are unlikely to get themselves bitten, and if they do get bitten, it is unlikely that they got that way by doing something stupid. "

Reach Air Medical Services -Summer 2002 "Treat the bite site with a clean dressing.  Attempts to cut, suck or remove the venom are considered to be ineffective and should not be attempted.  There is one device on the market called the "Sawyer" extractor. It is a suction device which has been shown to remove some venom from bite sites if used within the first five to ten minutes of the bite.  It is not common for pre-hospital care providers to have this device, but if it is available and less than 10 minutes have passed, is considered a reasonable tool to attempt to extract some of the venom. The studies from this have been somewhat controversial, but it is the only device which appears to provide any significant removal of venom from the tissues." http://www.mediplane.com/Newsletter/Archives/Summer_2002/summer_2002.html

I would love to hear a specific medical reason for not using the Sawyer immediately if it does not delay evac.

Great discussion, knowledge we should all keep in mind when choosing to live in rattlesnake territory.

Offline RobertW

  • Moderator
  • Raccoon
  • *****
  • Posts: Plenty of Posts!
  • Clear Skies!
Re: Rattlesnake bite procedure?
« Reply #23 on: Jun 21, 07, 12:25:39 PM »
Thanks "cedar".  Great information and statistics.

Offline Wrightwood

  • Administrator
  • Raccoon
  • *****
  • Posts: Plenty of Posts!
  • Wildlife Gateway
Re: Rattlesnake bite procedure?
« Reply #24 on: Jun 21, 07, 12:59:04 PM »
Quote
There is one device on the market called the "Sawyer" extractor. It is a suction device which has been shown to remove some venom from bite sites if used within the first five to ten minutes of the bite.  It is not common for pre-hospital care providers to have this device, but if it is available and less than 10 minutes have passed, is considered a reasonable tool to attempt to extract some of the venom. The studies from this have been somewhat controversial, but it is the only device which appears to provide any significant removal of venom from the tissues.

Thanks cedar as that confirms my earlier posting:

I still think that I'd use the Sawyer Extractor if it was handy and the bite had just occurred. Say within the first 10 minutes or so. I see this as a choice between removing some of the possible venom right away vs the exacerbated tissue damage.