This is more complicated than most know. The ruling didn't apply to us here in the Angeles, but is under review and appeals and still in the courts. The situation in the Arizona Forest is quite different than ours here in the Angeles. I'm told that there, they were charging the fee just to access the Forest. We don't do that here in the Angeles. According the wording, we can still charge a "recreation fee" if people were using an area of the forest that included amenities provided by the Forest Service such as bathrooms, trash cans, benches, tables and information boards. As USFS Volunteers we have backed off issuing "NRFs" (Notice of Required Fees) in areas that don't include these amenities, even though they fall in the "Required Fee Recreation Areas".
You may have noticed benches and tables popping up in certain areas, so that we can continue to require an Adventure Pass. Adventure Passes are still required in non- concession campgrounds, at Vincent Gap, Jackson Lake, Arch Picnic Area, etc., because these amenities are provided. We quit writing NRFs for people just parked along the road such as Big Rock Creek, etc. It is still being debated in the courts and the Adventure Pass may go away all together.
The problem is that here in this forest the Adventure Pass funds
ALL of the materials used in keeping these areas up, such as Toilet Paper, Trash Cans, Fire pits, BBQ stands, Trash liners, paint to cover over graffiti, etc. Congress does not provide for this in the budget, which they will have to do if the Adventure Pass goes away. That is one reason this bill to end the Adventure Pass is always put on the back burner and left for the next Congress to deal with, who then do the same.
If money is included in the budget to provide for these materials, I don't think anybody will care if the Adventure Pass goes away. I know when out on Patrol for the USFS, we have better things to do, but can you imagine the complaints when the bathrooms are locked up because we don't have money to buy toilet paper and the trash cans go away because we don't have money to buy the liners and graffiti is no longer dealt with because there is no money to buy the paint to cover it over?
People make the argument that "I pay taxes and so shouldn't have to pay another fee to recreate on public U.S. land". Good argument, but your tax dollars aren't showing up here in the forest to provide the things the public wants. That's the whole crux of the issue.
We will just see have to see what happens. Despite what people may think, we don't enjoy writing citations for Adventure Pass violations, but we do recognize the need to do so if we want to provide the amenities expected. That is why I don't have a problem buying an Adventure Pass every year, but then I see both sides of the issue.